← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Chandra vs N8n
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Chandra
OCR model that handles complex tables, forms, handwriting with full layout.
10.5K
Stars
0
Weekly
31/100
Health
N8n
Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.
187.5K
Stars
0
Weekly
67/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
N8n has the larger GitHub footprint with 187.5K stars.
Momentum
Chandra is currently growing faster at 0 stars this week.
Maintenance
N8n has the stronger health score at 67/100.
Side-by-side Metrics
| Signal | Chandra | N8n |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 10.5K | 187.5K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 31 | 67 |
| Contributors | 5 | 629 |
| Commits per week | 1.5 | 143.4 |
| Open issues | 48 | 1.5K |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| License | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last commit | 19d ago | 15h ago |
| Last release | v0.2.0 | stable |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.