← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Figma Context MCP vs Hermes Agent
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Figma Context MCP
MCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor
14.7K
Stars
0
Weekly
47/100
Health
Hermes Agent
The agent that grows with you
144.7K
Stars
0
Weekly
80/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
Hermes Agent has the larger GitHub footprint with 144.7K stars.
Momentum
Figma Context MCP is currently growing faster at 0 stars this week.
Maintenance
Hermes Agent has the stronger health score at 80/100.
Side-by-side Metrics
| Signal | Figma Context MCP | Hermes Agent |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 14.7K | 144.7K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 47 | 80 |
| Contributors | 26 | 1.0K |
| Commits per week | 5.0 | 610.4 |
| Open issues | 26 | 10.2K |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Last commit | 12d ago | 14h ago |
| Last release | v0.11.0 | v2026.5.7 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.