← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
llama.cpp vs Caveman
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
llama.cpp
LLM inference in C/C++
109.6K
Stars
+1.2K
Weekly
100/100
Health
Caveman
🪨 why use many token when few token do trick — Claude Code skill that cuts 65% of tokens by talking like caveman
58.3K
Stars
0
Weekly
64/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
llama.cpp has the larger GitHub footprint with 109.6K stars.
Momentum
llama.cpp is currently growing faster at +1.2K stars this week.
Maintenance
llama.cpp has the stronger health score at 100/100.
Side-by-side Metrics
| Signal | llama.cpp | Caveman |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 109.6K | 58.3K |
| Weekly growth | +1.2K | 0 |
| Health score | 100 | 64 |
| Contributors | 1.7K | 28 |
| Commits per week | 86.2 | 13.7 |
| Open issues | 1.6K | 203 |
| Language | C++ | JavaScript |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Last commit | 19h ago | 2d ago |
| Last release | b9113 | v1.8.1 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.