← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Local Deep Research vs llama.cpp
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Local Deep Research
~95% on SimpleQA (e.g. Qwen3.6-27B on a 3090). Supports all local and cloud LLMs (llama.cpp, Ollama, Google, ...). 10+ search engines - arXiv, PubMed, your private documents. Everything Local & Encrypted.
7.2K
Stars
0
Weekly
75/100
Health
llama.cpp
LLM inference in C/C++
109.6K
Stars
+1.2K
Weekly
100/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
llama.cpp has the larger GitHub footprint with 109.6K stars.
Momentum
llama.cpp is currently growing faster at +1.2K stars this week.
Maintenance
llama.cpp has the stronger health score at 100/100.
Side-by-side Metrics
| Signal | Local Deep Research | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 7.2K | 109.6K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | +1.2K |
| Health score | 75 | 100 |
| Contributors | 49 | 1.7K |
| Commits per week | 110.8 | 86.2 |
| Open issues | 265 | 1.6K |
| Language | Python | C++ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Last commit | 17h ago | 16h ago |
| Last release | v1.6.9 | b9113 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.