← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Local Deep Research vs Ollama
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Local Deep Research
~95% on SimpleQA (e.g. Qwen3.6-27B on a 3090). Supports all local and cloud LLMs (llama.cpp, Ollama, Google, ...). 10+ search engines - arXiv, PubMed, your private documents. Everything Local & Encrypted.
7.2K
Stars
0
Weekly
75/100
Health
Ollama
Get up and running with Kimi-K2.5, GLM-5, MiniMax, DeepSeek, gpt-oss, Qwen, Gemma and other models.
171.2K
Stars
+450
Weekly
95/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
Ollama has the larger GitHub footprint with 171.2K stars.
Momentum
Ollama is currently growing faster at +450 stars this week.
Maintenance
Ollama has the stronger health score at 95/100.
Side-by-side Metrics
| Signal | Local Deep Research | Ollama |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 7.2K | 171.2K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | +450 |
| Health score | 75 | 95 |
| Contributors | 49 | 600 |
| Commits per week | 110.8 | 24.5 |
| Open issues | 265 | 3.2K |
| Language | Python | Go |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Last commit | 20h ago | 19h ago |
| Last release | v1.6.9 | v0.23.2 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.