← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Open Design vs AutoGPT
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Open Design
🎨 Local-first, open-source alternative to Anthropic's Claude Design. ⚡ 19 Skills · ✨ 71 brand-grade Design Systems 🖼 Generate web · desktop · mobile prototypes · slides · images · videos · HyperFrames 📦 Sandboxed preview · HTML/PDF/PPTX/MP4 export 🤖 Runs on Claude Code / Codex / Cursor / Gemini / OpenCode / Qwen / Copilot / Hermes / Kimi CLI.
37.4K
Stars
0
Weekly
80/100
Health
AutoGPT
AutoGPT is the vision of accessible AI for everyone, to use and to build on. Our mission is to provide the tools, so that you can focus on what matters.
184.2K
Stars
+174
Weekly
95/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
AutoGPT has the larger GitHub footprint with 184.2K stars.
Momentum
AutoGPT is currently growing faster at +174 stars this week.
Maintenance
AutoGPT has the stronger health score at 95/100.
Side-by-side Metrics
| Signal | Open Design | AutoGPT |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 37.4K | 184.2K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | +174 |
| Health score | 80 | 95 |
| Contributors | 171 | 816 |
| Commits per week | 43.7 | 49.8 |
| Open issues | 314 | 391 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| License | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last commit | 21h ago | 15h ago |
| Last release | open-design-v0.6.0 | autogpt-platform-beta-v0.6.59 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.