← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Trigger.dev vs Airflow
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev – build and deploy fully‑managed AI agents and workflows
14.9K
Stars
0
Weekly
66/100
Health
Airflow
Apache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflows
45.4K
Stars
0
Weekly
71/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
Airflow has the larger GitHub footprint with 45.4K stars.
Momentum
Trigger.dev is currently growing faster at 0 stars this week.
Maintenance
Airflow has the stronger health score at 71/100.
Side-by-side Metrics
| Signal | Trigger.dev | Airflow |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 14.9K | 45.4K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 66 | 71 |
| Contributors | 135 | 4.4K |
| Commits per week | 20.8 | 181.2 |
| Open issues | 306 | 1.7K |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last commit | 16h ago | 15h ago |
| Last release | v4.4.5 | helm-chart/1.21.0 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.